There has been numerous version of
Sweeney Todd, none of which are identical to others. Likewise, Tim Burton’s Sweeney Todd, while maintaining the
similar central plot as the theatrical version of Sweeeny Todd, is also quite different as it is thematically less
far-reaching than on-stage version of the same story. However, no matter the
version of the story, they all send a coherent message about cannibalism,
urbanization and industrialism.
| Meat Pie... Delicious or not? |
Before investigating into those themes,
it is best to first look at how Tim Burton justifies Sweeney’s heinous act of
murder. Burton presents Sweeney as a victim of corrupt legal system, whose wife
and daughter have been abducted by a corrupt official. Presenting that point of
view of the character provides room for the audience to sympathize and
empathize with such morally unsettling character.
Despite slight modification in
Sweeney’s history, Burton didn’t lose hold of the themes of cannibalism and
industrialism, effectively drawing on several issues that come with
urbanization and industrialization. One of the very important issues addressed
in the movie is social inequality, which can be seen at several different
points of the movie. Right off the bat, Sweeney himself is a victim of social
inequality, as Judge Turpin has taken Sweeney’s family away from him through
abuse of his power. This idea of social inequality is further enforced through
Burton’s use of mise-en-scene. Mrs. Lovett’s house is located on a dark and
filthy alley, with almost colorless, roach-infested interior, which creates
stark contrast with Judge Turpin’s pristine, spacious, well-furnished house.
This visual contrast of the two households, though subtle, effectively
communicates the theme of social and monetary inequality.
The idea of industrialization is
further enforced by the use of cannibalism. In different versions of Sweeney Todd, Sweeney explicitly imposes
the grotesque parallel between the nature of industrialization and cannibalism:
“The history of the world/ Is who gets eaten and who gets to eat.” This line
not only is a strong reference to the social inequality, but also is a
criticism of disproportionately competitive nature of capitalistic industry,
where people constantly have to step on others’ foot to climb the social hierarchical
ladder. This concept of symbolic cannibalism is later expanded into more
literal sense of cannibalism, as the lower class people literally start feeding
off the people above the social ladder, which introduces a twisted, grotesque
sense of vengeance and justice.
I agree with what you say, Choi, but I think sympathy is not the only thing the audience feels for Sweeney. Towards the end of the film, sympathy is perhaps the last thing on the audience's mind as Todd's gruesome death is done in the same way that Todd used for his own victims (to borrow a popular phrase, a taste if his own medicine). Not that the audience forgets what was done to Todd, but the "innocent" (they at least bore no problems with Todd) people that he killed left and right in his barber shop turned Todd into a monster (and it is extraordinarily difficult to feel sympathy for a monster). This was no longer a revenge story; it became a horror film.
ReplyDeleteIn Burton's other films, the outsider character usually wants to be able to reach into normal society. However, I think that this story is one rare occasion in which the outsider both deserves to stay an outsider and wants to stay one as well
Charles Elkins